Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 04/28/04
- Previous message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:18:12 +0000 (UTC)
"Jerry Coffin" <jcoffin@taeus.com> wrote in message
news:b2e4b04.0404271646.24e70541@posting.google.com...
[snip]
> If anything, it looks to me like thie situation is getting worse: I
> don't think I've looked at anything in the last 5 years that was
> nearly AS CLOSE to optimal as Control Data's FORTRAN IV compiler
> typically produced 20+ years ago!
>
Computers can access fixed locations in memory
faster that relative locations. Recursion requires
local variables to be stored on the stack, i.e. to
be accessed using relative locations. Data structures
on the heap are even more complicated to access.
Dynamic storage is very bad, you can see the computer
stop for several thousand million clock cycles whilst the
garbage collector tries to find some more memory.
Andrew Swallow
- Previous message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Ernst Lippe: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|