Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?
From: Tom St Denis (tom_at_securescience.net)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: asd_at_asd.com: "Help w/adding a TableColumn"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:42:00 GMT
Julie wrote:
> "Douglas A. Gwyn" wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>(Since the languages do not have a subset/
>>superset relationship, in general compiling a
>>C source program with a C++ compiler is not safe.)
>
>
> Compare that with what BS says in TC++PL:
>
> http://www.filibeto.org/sun/lib/development/c++_iiird/appB.pdf
Um I just read that PDF. The PDF seems to agree that there are valid
[albeit of questionable usage] C statements that are not valid in C++
[and vice versa].
I don't see how that contradicts what Douglas said.
Tom
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Previous message: asd_at_asd.com: "Help w/adding a TableColumn"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Next in thread: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|