Does anybody have an opinion on how widely Swing apps are accepted in
Fortune 500 companies? My client -- a small IT secruity outfit, is
considering revamping their flagship product, a Swing application with a SQL
Server backend.
They're questioning whether it makes sense to continue developing the
existing Swing app -- possibly provisioning it via WebStart, or, to bite the
bullet and develop a full-fledged J2EE app. They have the idea that thick
clients are a hard-sell -- or even automatically rejected, at certain
companies.
Re: Swing usage in Fortune 500 companies ...Griffith Jones wrote: ... Does anybody have an opinion on how widely Swing apps are accepted in Fortune 500 companies? ... I haven't actually come across a thick client ban but certainly there is a perception among many companies that 'web is best' which has led the company I work for to redevelop many of its functions in browser based applications. ... (comp.lang.java.gui)
Swing usage in Fortune 500 companies ... Does anybody have an opinion on how widely Swing apps are accepted in ... My client -- a small IT secruity outfit, ... considering revamping their flagship product, a Swing application with a SQL ... (comp.lang.java.gui)
Re: Swing usage in Fortune 500 companies ...Griffith Jones wrote: ... Does anybody have an opinion on how widely Swing apps are accepted in Fortune 500 companies? ... My client -- a small IT secruity outfit, is considering revamping their flagship product, a Swing application with a SQL Server backend. ... (comp.lang.java.gui)
Re: The Vinland Maps Ink ... >> client want to reach. ... There are lawyers who will ... shop around until they get an expert who gives them the opinion they ... It's not so much that I require the evidence as that I object to ... (sci.archaeology)
Re: Help in proving that Access is an industrial strength front-end ... A lot of that appears in Newsgroups like this ...opinion of the product. ... If I were the client and you couldn't convince me of these things I ...promoting his own product (which in my opinion is totally redundant for ... (comp.databases.ms-access)
