Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)

From: Lew <lew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:02:55 -0400

mlw wrote:

real 0m1.020s
user 0m0.860s
sys 0m0.092s
test@localhost:~/scat$ time java test
Java heap space
Total object:741838

real 0m19.178s
user 0m16.893s
sys 0m1.728s

You're still not timing memory allocation but JVM startup and other factors.

-- Lew
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: mlw

References:
- C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
  - From: mlw

Prev by Date: pls fix with instructional comments
Next by Date: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
Previous by thread: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
Next by thread: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
... sys 0m0.092s ... Instead, it beats people which have enough inexperience in a matter, to publish microbenchmarks in that specific matter. ... private static void allocate{ ...
(comp.lang.java)
Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
... sys 0m0.092s ... Java heap space ... You're still not timing memory allocation but JVM startup and other ...
(comp.lang.java)
Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
... sys 0m0.092s ... Java heap space ... You're still not timing memory allocation but JVM startup and other ...
(comp.lang.java)