Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: Lew <lew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:13:43 -0400
mlw wrote:
Lew wrote:
mlw wrote:real 0m1.020sYou're still not timing memory allocation but JVM startup and other
user 0m0.860s
sys 0m0.092s
test@localhost:~/scat$ time java test
Java heap space
Total object:741838
real 0m19.178s
user 0m16.893s
sys 0m1.728s
factors.
Start up is NOT 18 seconds, so what other factors could we possibly be
talking about?
Beats me.
-- Lew
.
- References:
- C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: mlw
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: Lew
- Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- From: mlw
- C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- Prev by Date: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- Next by Date: this is wha i'm working on: any help???
- Previous by thread: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- Next by thread: Re: C++ vs Java "new" (no flame war please!)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|