Re: 64-bit G5?
From: Adam Warner (usenet_at_consulting.net.nz)
Date: 10/07/03
- Next message: Bruce Hoult: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Previous message: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Next in thread: Adam Warner: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Reply: Adam Warner: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:33:28 +1300
Hi Christopher Browne,
>> Apple's core market is in Video, Photographic image manipulation, and
>> DTP. For these uses, 64 bit is only about allowing larger memory
>> address spaces per process, and the G5 lets you do that now.
>
> Hmm? From what I saw in Duane's comments, this isn't something that
> MacOS-X supports, G5 or no. If they aren't supporting 64 bit pointers,
> by default, then you have NOT got "larger memory address spaces per
> process."
I'm speculating here that Raffael's comment may imply that Apple has moved
the kernel space above 4GB, permitting a full 4GB of address space for
32-bit applications, which could be an improvement of 1-2GB.
Regards,
Adam
- Next message: Bruce Hoult: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Previous message: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Next in thread: Adam Warner: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Reply: Adam Warner: "Re: 64-bit G5?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|