Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 10/29/03
- Next message: Andreas Rossberg: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Andreas Rossberg: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Ray Blaak: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: prunesquallor_at_comcast.net: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Oct 2003 05:28:11 -0800
Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net> wrote in message news:<uk76oio9l.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>...
> The clearest, simplest, most elegant presentation of Goedel's result I have
> seen is called "Beautifying Gödel", by Eric C.R. Hehner (my old supervisor in
> fact) at http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/God.pdf
>
> It is quite instructive, going right to the heart of the issues. It also deals
> with the "G v ~G" business above.
As pointed out by Aatu, this paper, which would be better titled
"Mangling Gödel", contains some odd misconceptions, including a
highly original one about the second incompleteness theorem.
- Next message: Andreas Rossberg: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Andreas Rossberg: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Ray Blaak: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: prunesquallor_at_comcast.net: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]