Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 10/31/03
- Next message: ketil+news_at_ii.uib.no: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Bradd W. Szonye: "Re: LAID (was: python libs v lisp coolness?"
- In reply to: Ray Blaak: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Oct 2003 09:02:20 +0100
Ray Blaak <rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net> writes:
> In particular, Gödel sentences don't seem to have any truth meaning: any
> attempt to evaluate them give rises to the cyclical spinning of true then
> false then true..., i.e. an infinite loop in practical terms.
Not at all. The Gödel sentence for a theory T is equivalent to "T is
consistent", and this equivalence is provable in T itself.
- Next message: ketil+news_at_ii.uib.no: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Bradd W. Szonye: "Re: LAID (was: python libs v lisp coolness?"
- In reply to: Ray Blaak: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]