Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
From: Adrian Hey (ahey_at_NoSpicedHam.iee.org)
Date: 10/31/03
- Next message: Joe Marshall: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Joe Marshall: "Re: OCaml: I am not impressed"
- In reply to: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Reply: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:55:48 +0000
Joe Marshall wrote:
> Ah, so the theory is correct but the implementor chose not to use it.
>
> Interesting....
Nope. It's factually incorrect and illogical, but not interesting.
Regards
-- Adrian Hey
- Next message: Joe Marshall: "Re: More static type fun."
- Previous message: Joe Marshall: "Re: OCaml: I am not impressed"
- In reply to: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Next in thread: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Reply: Joe Marshall: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
