comp.lang.lisp
By Author

4475 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 09/30/03
Ending: 10/31/03

• A. Lloyd Flanagan
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/18/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/18/03)
• A.M. Kuchling
  • Re: What you can do with macros in Lisp (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
• Aaron Denney
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
• Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
• Adam Warner
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: ``my standard library is better than yours'' [was Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint] (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/31/03)
  • Re: Object Identity [was Re: More static type fun.] (10/31/03)
  • Object Identity [was Re: More static type fun.] (10/31/03)
  • ``my standard library is better than yours'' [was Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint] (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/27/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/24/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/23/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/23/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/23/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/22/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/22/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/22/03)
  • Re: OT: ArmedBear Lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/19/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/19/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/16/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/08/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/06/03)
  • Re: trouble writing to files with names beginning with . (10/06/03)
  • Re: trouble writing to files with names beginning with . (10/06/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
• Adrian Hey
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Phonecodes in Haskell (was Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
• Alain Picard
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/30/03)
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Lisp support on CD Linux Distros? (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: How to implement these conventional data structures? (10/24/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/19/03)
  • Re: cmucl/multiprocessing (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/16/03)
  • Re: cmucl/multiprocessing (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
• Alan Crowe
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: [pre-announce, call for contributors] cl-typesetting (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/18/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/18/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/18/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/17/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/16/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/15/03)
  • Re: What was the impetus for the LAMBDA macro? (10/15/03)
  • Re: What you can do with macros in Lisp (10/13/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: cl-typesetting saturday night news (10/05/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: macros, &rest parameters, mulitple evaluation, and forwarding (10/02/03)
  • Re: concatenate atoms into string (10/01/03)
• Alan Gauld
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/16/03)
• Alan Offer
  • Re: Python is Considered Harmful (10/30/03)
• Albert Lai
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
• Alex Martelli
  • Re: Python is Considered Harmful (10/27/03)
  • Re: What static typing makes difficult (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/19/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/19/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: The compiler canard (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Cross-posting is good (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/03/03)
• Alex McGuire
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
• Alex Mizrahi
  • Re: Non-Lisp "macro" system closest to Common Lisp's? (10/27/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/22/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/18/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/18/03)
  • free common lisp for win32 (10/17/03)
  • Re: cmucl/multiprocessing (10/15/03)
  • cmucl/multiprocessing (10/14/03)
  • meta (10/10/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/07/03)
  • name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
  • debugger (10/06/03)
• Alex Shinn
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/20/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/17/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/17/03)
• Alex Tibbles
  • [OT] Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
  • Re: ArmedBear Lisp? (was [ANN] pg-dot-lisp version 0.19) (10/08/03)
  • Re: Lisp and Version Control (10/03/03)
• Alexander Schmolck
  • Re: Modules vs name spaces (Was: Global namespace) (10/30/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/11/03)
  • Re: Lisp libraries (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Significant whitespace (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Documentation (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/03/03)
• Alexander Schreiber
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/05/03)
  • Re: Documentation (10/04/03)
  • Re: Lisp and Version Control (10/02/03)
• Alfonso Esteban Gonzalez Sencion
  • Re: XML with lisp (10/15/03)
  • Graphs representation (10/14/03)
  • XML with lisp (10/14/03)
  • LISP implementation in windows with graphics capabilities? (10/10/03)
• Allan Adler
  • specs for no-frills lisp (10/05/03)
• amerit
  • (JOB) AutoCAD/VB contract at PG&E SF California, 5 years of LISP required (10/15/03)
• Andreas Andersen
  • Threads in cmulc (10/14/03)
• Andreas Hinze
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: Lisp and Version Control (10/06/03)
• Andreas Rossberg
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
• Andrew Dalke
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/21/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/21/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
• Andrew Le Couteur Bisson
  • Re: Lisp machines (10/14/03)
  • Lisp machines (10/14/03)
• Andrew Philpot
  • ILC 2003: some impressions (10/19/03)
• ant_at_afghan.dogpound
  • Re: (+ Lisp Music) (10/24/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/24/03)
• Anton van Straaten
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/30/03)
  • Re: Hindley-Milner in Common Lisp (10/30/03)
  • Re: Pure LISP implementation (10/27/03)
  • Re: Terminology question: are s-exps the text or the data or both? (10/26/03)
  • Re: Terminology question: are s-exps the text or the data or both? (10/26/03)
  • Re: Terminology question: are s-exps the text or the data or both? (10/26/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/20/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/20/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/19/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/18/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/18/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Lisp vs. Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
  • Re: Lisp vs. Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: ILC2003 Moment: McCarthy Kills Kenny! Omigod! (10/17/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: Church vs Turing Smackdown (10/17/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/16/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/16/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/16/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: NYC Lisp Conf -- What tutorials will there be? (no listing at site...) (10/12/03)
• Antonio Menezes Leitao
  • [ANNOUNCE] The Linj Language (10/10/03)
• Arthur Lemmens
  • Re: Documentation strings in defclass (10/03/03)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: Non-Lisp "macro" system closest to Common Lisp's? (10/25/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
• Aurélien Campéas
  • Re: Static typing (was: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/31/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/31/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/30/03)
  • Re: beginner closures (10/10/03)
• Avi Blackmore
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/17/03)
  • Re: Car and cdr (Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (macro tangent) (10/07/03)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/29/03)
  • Re: How to implement a control for "you are not allowed to call me" (10/27/03)
  • Re: Error: :CREATOR :NAME are invalid initargs !? Plz help! (10/24/03)
  • Re: define-modify-macro (10/24/03)
  • Re: define-modify-macro (10/24/03)
  • Re: define-modify-macro (10/24/03)
  • Re: What's the CL equivalent of Scheme's letrec? (10/24/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/23/03)
  • Re: dynamic variables and multithreading? (10/23/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/22/03)
  • Re: filesystem reliability (10/22/03)
  • Re: newbie: initialising structures (10/21/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Papers/essays on lisp compiler construction (10/17/03)
  • Re: defmethod vs defun (10/16/03)
  • Re: Lisp machines (10/15/03)
  • Re: tail recursion guidelines (10/14/03)
  • Re: methods & types (10/10/03)
  • Re: Why no BACKQUOTE special operator? (10/10/03)
  • Re: Checking recursive calls (10/10/03)
  • Re: Checking recursive calls (10/10/03)
  • Re: Why no BACKQUOTE special operator? (10/09/03)
  • Re: Why no BACKQUOTE special operator? (10/09/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/06/03)
  • Re: symbol vs. string (10/04/03)
• Basile STARYNKEVITCH
  • Re: OCaml: I am not impressed (10/31/03)
  • Re: GUI and CGI development (10/03/03)
• Basim Al-Shaikhli
  • Re: LISP implementation in windows with graphics capabilities? (10/10/03)
• ben
  • so much pain with clisp + FFI + library + return char* (10/13/03)
• Ben Olasov
  • Re: site for posting Lisp projects / inviting bids (10/20/03)
  • site for posting Lisp projects / inviting bids (10/20/03)
• Bengt Richter
  • Re: Python is Considered Harmful (10/27/03)
  • class FLModule to translate/import foreign-source-lang modules? [Was: Re: Why don't people like lisp?] (10/21/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
• Bernhard Pfahringer
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/06/03)
• bigbinc03
  • lisp and c, C++ integration (10/04/03)
• Bill Anderson
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/21/03)
• Bill Birch
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
• Bill Clementson
  • Re: NYC Lisp Conf -- What tutorials will there be? (no listing at site...) (10/10/03)
  • Dever Lisp User Group Meeting #5 (10/03/03)
• Bjorn Pettersen
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/26/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/24/03)
• Björn Lindberg
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/29/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/29/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/15/03)
  • Re: (newsp ARC)? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Common Lisp / Scheme comparison (10/10/03)
  • Re: startup time (was: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/10/03)
  • Re: Common Lisp / Scheme comparison (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/07/03)
  • Re: name conflicts in packages (10/07/03)
  • Re: Is it just style or another reason? (10/02/03)
• bloch-pas-spahem_at_pas-spahem-noos.fr
  • Re: examples of non-traditional source code presentation? (10/30/03)
• Bob Coyne
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/27/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/27/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/26/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
• Bob Riemenschneider
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
• Bob Smith
  • what does (featurep 'hilit19) do? (10/09/03)
  • hilit19 not recognized (10/09/03)
• Borcis
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
• Bradd W. Szonye
  • Re: LAID (was: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Whoa! Do Python and Lisp really have LAMBDA ? (10/26/03)
• Bradley J Lucier
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/06/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
• Brendan Van Horn
  • Re: Film at 11: the RtL Highlight Film (10/26/03)
• Brian Downing
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/24/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
• Brian Kelley
  • Re: wxPython and macros (was: Why don't people like lisp? (10/27/03)
  • Re: wxPython and macros (was: Why don't people like lisp? (10/26/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/22/03)
• Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (was: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters) (10/03/03)
• Brian McNamara!
  • Re: OCaml: I am not impressed (was: Re: More static type fun.) (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Psychology of type systems (was Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: What static typing makes difficult (10/25/03)
  • Re: What static typing makes difficult (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/17/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
• Bruce Hoult
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/17/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Common Lisp / Scheme comparison (10/10/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
  • Re: Static type checking in Lisp (10/01/03)
• Bruce Lewis
  • startup time (was: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/10/03)
  • algebra/prefix/infix (was: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/08/03)
• Bruce Nagel
  • Re: JMC meta-survey [was Re: Paul Graham's Road to Lisp!] (10/24/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/12/03)
• Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Global namespace (was Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/29/03)
  • Re: which lisp book ? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/06/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/05/03)
• Bud Rogers
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
• Bulent Murtezaoglu
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/22/03)
  • ILC in Istanbul? (10/19/03)
  • Re: tail recursion guidelines (10/16/03)
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/16/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/16/03)
• Carl Shapiro
  • Re: which lisp book ? (10/24/03)
  • Re: trouble writing to files with names beginning with . (10/07/03)
• Carlo v. Dango
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
• Category 5
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
• charlieb
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/31/03)
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/29/03)
  • Some Macro Questions. (10/29/03)
• Chris Beggy
  • Re: hyphenation (10/08/03)
• Chris Double
  • Re: Accessing COM objects (10/23/03)
• Chris Perkins
  • Re: embedding lisp in c++ (10/29/03)
• Chris Riesbeck
  • Re: Some Macro Questions. (10/29/03)
• Christian Lynbech
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/30/03)
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/29/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/28/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/28/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/21/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/20/03)
  • Re: Newby Misinformation ALERT! [OT] (10/17/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/17/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (10/17/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/16/03)
  • Re: Lisp machines (10/15/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (10/14/03)
  • Re: Cross-posting is good (10/10/03)
• Christian Nybø
  • Re: John "Practical" McCarthy? [was Re: ILC 2003: some impressions] (10/19/03)
• Christian Szegedy
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
• Christophe Rhodes
  • Re: Global namespace (was Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/29/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/29/03)
  • Re: Global namespace (was Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/29/03)
  • Re: lambda T-shirt fodder (10/28/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: How can prevent defun use global values? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/22/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/22/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/22/03)
  • Re: defconstant warnings (10/22/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/22/03)
  • Re: How to create local state for functions? (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/20/03)
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/19/03)
  • Re: DEFVAR vs. DEFPARAMETER (10/18/03)
  • Re: methods & types (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/03/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/03/03)
  • Re: macros, &rest parameters, mulitple evaluation, and forwarding (10/02/03)
• Christophe Turle
  • Re: defmethod vs defun (10/17/03)
  • Re: macros, &rest parameters, mulitple evaluation, and forwarding (10/03/03)
• Christopher Browne
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/26/03)
  • Re: filesystem reliability (10/22/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/19/03)
  • Re: XML with lisp (10/15/03)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/12/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/05/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
• Christopher C. Stacy
  • Re: ALU web site? (10/31/03)
  • ALU web site? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: filesystem reliability (10/23/03)
  • Re: filesystem reliability (10/22/03)
  • YMCA [was: My take on ARC] (10/21/03)
  • Re: Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/20/03)
  • Re: History of lexical scoping in Scheme and other Lisps? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Lisp machines (10/14/03)
  • Re: LISP implementation in windows with graphics capabilities? (10/10/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: trouble writing to files with names beginning with . (10/04/03)
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/04/03)
  • Re: convert an integer to a string (10/01/03)
  • Re: Looking for a better Text and HTML Lisp syntax (10/01/03)
• Christos
  • Re: Car and cdr (Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/22/03)
  • Re: Car and cdr (Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
• chucklyfun
  • CLisp package search path (10/15/03)
• Clint
  • hi (10/12/03)
• Coby Beck
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/31/03)
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/20/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Newbie - request for code comments (10/12/03)
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/08/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/07/03)
  • Re: Conflicts between slot accessors and symbols naming functions in CL package? (10/05/03)
  • Re: Is it just style or another reason? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Is it just style or another reason? (10/01/03)
• cody
  • Re: Cross-posting is good (10/12/03)
• Conrad Barski
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/19/03)
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/19/03)
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/19/03)
  • UNDEFMETHOD (10/18/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/18/03)
  • Re: (newsp ARC)? (10/14/03)
  • (newsp ARC)? (10/14/03)
• Cor Gest
  • Re: Looking for a better Text and HTML Lisp syntax (10/02/03)
• Corey Coughlin
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
• Craig Brozefsky
  • Re: MOPs (warning: LONG) (10/24/03)
  • Re: CL & Practicality (10/14/03)
• ctu
  • Re: trouble writing to files with names beginning with . (10/06/03)
• Damien R. Sullivan
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/24/03)
• dan
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/18/03)
  • Re: What you can do with macros in Lisp (10/12/03)
• Dan Corkill
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/19/03)
  • Re: UNDEFMETHOD (10/18/03)
• Dan Katz
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/28/03)
• Dan Muller
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (10/17/03)
  • Re: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32 (10/17/03)
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Re: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32 (10/17/03)
  • Re: Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Logical pathnames on Windows (WAS: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32) (10/17/03)
  • Re: make-pathname in LW PE on Win32 (10/16/03)
  • make-pathname in LW PE on Win32 (10/16/03)
• Daniel Barlow
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/30/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/30/03)
  • Re: python libs v lisp coolness? (10/30/03)
  • Re: PING The Class of 2003: Yer gaining... (10/30/03)
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/29/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/29/03)
  • Re: Curious about Hemlock? (10/28/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/28/03)
  • Re: Pure LISP implementation (10/27/03)
  • Re: Libraries (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • asdf-install (was Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/22/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: OT: ArmedBear Lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: Homework question: LOOP (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/20/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to do this? (10/19/03)
  • Re: free common lisp for win32 (10/18/03)
  • Re: cmucl/multiprocessing (10/17/03)
  • Re: Newby Misinformation ALERT! [OT] (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to compile a lisp file ? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to compile a lisp file ? (10/16/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/16/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/15/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/15/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Common Lisp / Scheme comparison (10/11/03)
  • Re: Rainer Joswig's weblog inaccessible? (10/10/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/09/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
  • Re: Lisp libraries (10/08/03)
  • [ANN] cirCLe CD market research effort (was Re: nyc lisp conf....) (10/05/03)
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/04/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/03/03)
• Daniel C. Wang
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
• Daniel P. M. Silva
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/13/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/12/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
• Daniel Silva
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
• Darius
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Hindley-Milner in Common Lisp (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python is Considered Harmful (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
  • Re: Lisp and Version Control (10/03/03)
• dave
  • define-modify-macro (10/24/03)
• Dave Benjamin
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/22/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
• Dave Brown
  • Re: filesystem reliability (10/25/03)
• Dave Pearson
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/03/03)
• DaveNlp
  • Re: concatenate atoms into string (10/02/03)
• David Combs
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/27/03)
  • NYC Lisp Conf -- What tutorials will there be? (no listing at site...) (10/10/03)
  • Re: nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/10/03)
  • nyc lisp conf: WAY too expensive! (4me) How to *turn-away* lisp-interest! (10/03/03)
• david emile lamy
  • Re: which lisp book ? (10/25/03)
  • Re: which lisp book ? (10/25/03)
• David Eppstein
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/10/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/05/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
• David Golden
  • Re: Can we have a hierarchical packages (10/18/03)
  • Re: ILC 2003: some impressions (10/16/03)
  • Re: Rainer Joswig's weblog inaccessible? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
• David Lichteblau
  • Re: READ-PRESERVING-WHITESPACE in recursive calls (10/22/03)
  • Re: CLisp api for parsing floats? (10/10/03)
  • Re: CLisp api for parsing floats? (10/10/03)
  • Re: CLisp api for parsing floats? (10/10/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/10/03)
  • Re: CLisp api for parsing floats? (10/10/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
• David Magda
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/08/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/06/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/06/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/05/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/05/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/04/03)
• David Mertz
  • What static typing makes difficult (10/25/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/17/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/16/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/15/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
• David Rush
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/20/03)
  • Re: Express What, not How. (10/18/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • OT: Japanese Orthography (was Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme) (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
• David Steuber
  • Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/31/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/25/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/25/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/24/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/23/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/23/03)
  • Re: SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/23/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/23/03)
  • Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants) (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • SLIME ming SBCL on OS X (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Re: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/23/03)
  • Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants (10/22/03)
  • Re: JMC meta-survey [was Re: Paul Graham's Road to Lisp!] (10/22/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/19/03)
  • Re: One Emacs to Rule them all. (10/16/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/16/03)
  • Re: One Emacs to Rule them all. (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/15/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/15/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/15/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/15/03)
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/14/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/14/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (was ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/14/03)
  • Re: SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/13/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Cross-posting is good (10/10/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/10/03)
  • SBCL CVS repository being unfriendly? (10/09/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/08/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/07/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/06/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (10/05/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/05/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/05/03)
  • Re: 64-bit G5? (was: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters) (10/03/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/03/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/03/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/02/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/02/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/02/03)
  • Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/02/03)
• David Trudgett
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/11/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/11/03)
• Dennis Dunn
  • Re: Documentation (10/05/03)
  • Re: specs for no-frills lisp (10/05/03)
• Dirk Thierbach
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/31/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/31/03)
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/31/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/29/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/29/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python is Considered Harmful (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Test cases and static typing (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/25/03)
  • Re: Test cases and static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Test cases and static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Static typing (was: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/24/03)
  • Test cases and static typing (was: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Static typing (was: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/24/03)
  • Re: Static typing (10/23/03)
  • Static typing (was: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint) (10/23/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
• Dominic
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/03/03)
• Don Geddis
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/28/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/27/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/26/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint (10/24/03)
  • Re: BIG successes of Lisp (10/16/03)
  • Re: cmucl/multiprocessing (10/16/03)
• Donn Cave
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/14/03)
• Doug Tolton
  • Re: Looking for Mac OS X maintainer of "Regex Coach" (10/23/03)
  • Re: Accessing COM objects (10/23/03)
  • Re: JMC meta-survey [was Re: Paul Graham's Road to Lisp!] (10/22/03)
  • Re: Accessing COM objects (10/22/03)
  • Paul Graham bio pic is from ILC (10/22/03)
  • Re: Accessing COM objects (10/22/03)
  • Accessing COM objects (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: make-pathname problems (10/21/03)
  • make-pathname problems (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/21/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/20/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/20/03)
  • Re: Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/20/03)
  • Re: Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/19/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/19/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/19/03)
  • Assorted ILC 2003 Pictures (10/19/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/19/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/18/03)
  • Re: Cells at ILC2003: Top Ten Lessons (10/18/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/18/03)
  • Re: ILC2003: ARC (10/17/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/11/03)
  • See you at the ILC (10/11/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/11/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: lep/eli with sbcl (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/09/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/08/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/07/03)
  • Re: Explanation of macros; Haskell macros (10/07/03)
  • File transformations with Lisp (10/06/03)
  • Re: [ANN] cirCLe CD market research effort (was Re: nyc lisp conf....) (10/06/03)
  • Re: Some chapters of Practical Common Lisp on web. (10/06/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/04/03)
  • Re: Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme (10/03/03)
  • Re: Kudos to Andrew Choi and other Mac OS X porters (10/02/03)
  • Re: GUI and CGI development (10/01/03)
• Drazen Gemic
  • Re: Why don't people like lisp? (10/25/03)
• Drew McDermott
  • Re: examples of non-traditional source code presentation? (10/29/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/27/03)
  • Re: Terminology question: are s-exps the text or the data or both? (10/26/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  • Re: Terminology question: are s-exps the text or the data or both? (10/26/03)
  • Re: My take on ARC (10/20/03)
  • Re: What you can do with macros in Lisp (10/14/03)
  • Re: Why no BACKQUOTE special operator? (10/11/03)
• Duane Rettig
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/31/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/31/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/30/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/28/03)
  • Re: More static type fun. (10/27/03)
  • Re: Efficiency of multiple values (10/26/03)
  <