Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)
From: Joachim Durchholz (joachim.durchholz_at_web.de)
Date: 11/01/03
- Next message: Adam Warner: "Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants)"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Object Identity"
- Next in thread: Coby Beck: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Coby Beck: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 03:55:20 +0100
Frode Vatvedt Fjeld wrote:
> Joachim Durchholz <joachim.durchholz@web.de> writes:
>
>
>>Ah, that's interesting. How do you handle "incompatible changes",
>>e.g. when you replace a data structure by a completely different
>>one?
>
> Have you heard about this wonderful thing called "dynamic typing"? :-)
Yes.
It's unrelated to questions like "how to I prevent the system from
accessing an object that's in the midst of an incompatible change?"
Regards,
Jo
- Next message: Adam Warner: "Re: Libraries (Was: Programming By The Seat Of Your Pants)"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Object Identity"
- Next in thread: Coby Beck: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Coby Beck: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Maybe reply: Isaac Gouy: "Re: Live Patching (Re: More static type fun.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
