Re: Computability in principle
From: Anton van Straaten (anton_at_appsolutions.com)
Date: 11/05/03
- Next message: Rob Warnock: "Re: LISP & "The Art of Unix Programming""
- Previous message: Mark Carroll: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Markus Mottl: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Next in thread: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Reply: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Reply: Matthew Danish: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 14:05:51 GMT
Markus Mottl wrote:
> In comp.lang.functional Erann Gat <gat@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> > It is not yet clear whether quantum computation can really be made to
> > work. It may be that the practical difficulty of keeping N qbits
mutually
> > entangled grows exponentially with N, in which case the same argument
may
> > well apply.
>
> Indeed, I also fear that your argument might turn out to be true in
> practice. But well, as long as there is no evidence against large-scale
> quantum computers, I'll retain some healthy optimism :-)
My suspicion is that quantum computers will indeed turn out to be
miraculous, with one minor drawback: when they produce a correct answer, it
will not necessarily appear in the same universe in which the question was
asked...
Anton
- Next message: Rob Warnock: "Re: LISP & "The Art of Unix Programming""
- Previous message: Mark Carroll: "Re: Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint"
- In reply to: Markus Mottl: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Next in thread: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Reply: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Reply: Matthew Danish: "Re: Computability in principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]