Object oriented (Was: Basic defmethod question)
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen (hanche_at_math.ntnu.no)
Date: 11/05/03
- Next message: Peter Seibel: "Re: Need some Lisp expertise"
- Previous message: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- In reply to: Kent M Pitman: "Re: Basic defmethod question"
- Next in thread: Peter Seibel: "Re: Object oriented (Was: Basic defmethod question)"
- Reply: Peter Seibel: "Re: Object oriented (Was: Basic defmethod question)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 05 Nov 2003 23:46:26 +0100
+ Kent M Pitman <pitman@nhplace.com>:
| Regardless of the red herring of programming style (you mentioned
| "object oriented" in a way that seemed to imply the bogus but
| widespread use of it to refer to a style of programming rather than
| a pattern of resulting data at runtime)
Once again I am more intrigued by a parenthetical remark than about
what seemed to be the main issue at hand. Would you like to expand a
bit on this? What is bogus about the widespread use of "object
oriented", and what patterns of resulting data are you referring to?
-- * Harald Hanche-Olsen <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/> - Debating gives most of us much more psychological satisfaction than thinking does: but it deprives us of whatever chance there is of getting closer to the truth. -- C.P. Snow
- Next message: Peter Seibel: "Re: Need some Lisp expertise"
- Previous message: Aaron Denney: "Re: Computability in principle"
- In reply to: Kent M Pitman: "Re: Basic defmethod question"
- Next in thread: Peter Seibel: "Re: Object oriented (Was: Basic defmethod question)"
- Reply: Peter Seibel: "Re: Object oriented (Was: Basic defmethod question)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]