Re: Sequences other than list and vector
From: Björn Lindberg (d95-bli_at_nada.kth.se)
Date: 11/27/03
- Next message: Kent M Pitman: "Re: Another algorithmic complexity question"
- Previous message: Duane Rettig: "Re: More static type fun."
- In reply to: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Next in thread: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Reply: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 27 Nov 2003 01:34:25 +0100
james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de> writes:
> > ,----[ DOLIST Description ]
> > | At the time result-form is processed, var is bound to nil.
> > `----
> >
> > But why go to this length to ensure that var is visible to the
> > result-form, and then promise that var will be nil? That means that
> > var will never be of any use to the result-form.
>
> the result form could set it to something else.
But since that variable goes out of scope upon leaving the DOLIST
form, that is not very useful, right?
Björn
- Next message: Kent M Pitman: "Re: Another algorithmic complexity question"
- Previous message: Duane Rettig: "Re: More static type fun."
- In reply to: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Next in thread: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Reply: james anderson: "Re: Sequences other than list and vector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|