deja vu all over again?

From: Kenny Tilton (ktilton_at_nyc.rr.com)
Date: 11/30/03

  • Next message: Christopher Browne: "Statistics for comp.lang.lisp"
    Date: 29 Nov 2003 23:10:56 -0800
    
    

    Been reading up on the new Mac OS X developer IDE, preparatory to a
    port of Cello to OS X, hence first a port of Freeglut to OS X.

    Turns out they have worked out a way to link C/C++ on the fly, so you
    don't have to go thru a whole link every time you recompile one
    source.

    They point out that this also means you can continue from an error
    without quiting the failed run, just edit, recompile, and continue
    from the error.

    Hmm. I wonder what happens to existing C++ instances. :)

    Anyway, this all seems so familiar, just can't figure out why....

    :)

    kenny


  • Next message: Christopher Browne: "Statistics for comp.lang.lisp"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: deja vu all over again?
      ... > port of Cello to OS X, hence first a port of Freeglut to OS X. ... > without quiting the failed run, just edit, recompile, and continue ...
      (comp.lang.lisp)
    • Re: Slow networkperformance in current?
      ... Silly as it might seem when did you last recompile the iperf port? ... about to post a me too post yesterday, until I updated my system to use ... recompiling the port fixed the freeze and the <100Mbit/sec on localhost. ... Server listening on TCP port 5001 ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: libc5 on freebsd 6.3
      ... nothing in the software configuration has changed, but the cyrus port ... cyrus binaries are linked to both libc5 and libc6. ... You have to recompile all your installed ports as part of your upgrade ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: lyx, ld-elf-so, and undefined symbol
      ... >> of the system, rather than a port? ... Shouldn't the double rebuild have ... Hmm, I'd escaped that one until now. ... if lyx can recompile (it isn't at the moment, ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: missing library: intl.6
      ... >> Faking it? ... > being specified in the port. ... > and are too big to recompile right away. ... It would be better to use portupgrade for that. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)