Re: reducing number consing
From: William D Clinger (cesuraSPAM_at_verizon.net)
Date: 12/19/03
- Next message: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A brash newbie question on macrology"
- Previous message: Pascal Costanza: "Re: package-use-list & other results specification"
- In reply to: Cliff Crawford: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Next in thread: Luke Gorrie: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Reply: Luke Gorrie: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 19 Dec 2003 12:44:01 -0800
Cliff Crawford <cjc26@cornell.edu> wrote:
> | Why? Is GC an issue here?
>
> I'm worried it will be, because in typical usage it will get called
> 100,000 - 1,000,000 times.
At 32 bytes per call, that's 32 megabytes of short-lived data.
In all likelihood, you're worrying about less than one second
of gc time, probably much less.
Will
- Next message: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A brash newbie question on macrology"
- Previous message: Pascal Costanza: "Re: package-use-list & other results specification"
- In reply to: Cliff Crawford: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Next in thread: Luke Gorrie: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Reply: Luke Gorrie: "Re: reducing number consing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]