Re: rational arithmetic library?
taltman_at_noshpam.lbl.government
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: Yang, Chul-Woong: "Declaration question"
- Previous message: taltman_at_noshpam.lbl.government: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- In reply to: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Next in thread: Marco Antoniotti: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Reply: Marco Antoniotti: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:13:48 -0800
Pascal Bourguignon <spam@thalassa.informatimago.com> writes:
> I don't see what's the problem?
Well, I posted to c.l.l to get the CL response to my problem. I
quickly found out that rational types as bignum tuples is a given via
the CLHS. So, you're right; with CL, I'm set. But I'm still hunting
for a Scheme implementation which will provide exactly that as well,
since my code is in Scheme. :-)
[snip]
> ;; Definition of generic functions allowing free mixing of integers
> ;; and rationals left to the reader...
This reader already concocted something along these lines:
http://thar.lbl.gov/~taltman/rational.scm.html
:-)
> Of course, if you feel that's your integers that are restricted, you
> can implement your unrestricted int type in a similar fashion, and use
> it instead of integer...
That's true, but I'd like to save myself the trouble of re-inventing
the wheel if it's avoidable.
Thanks!
~Tomer
-- ()
- Next message: Yang, Chul-Woong: "Declaration question"
- Previous message: taltman_at_noshpam.lbl.government: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- In reply to: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Next in thread: Marco Antoniotti: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Reply: Marco Antoniotti: "Re: rational arithmetic library?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]