Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?
From: Peter Seibel (peter_at_javamonkey.com)
Date: 02/29/04
- Next message: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Previous message: Andreas Yankopolus: "Re: Initializing lists/arrays with structures"
- Next in thread: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Reply: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Reply: Steven M. Haflich: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:44:39 GMT
I'm guessing that on some historically important filesystem the
natural way to get the length of a file was the Lisp way: opening it
and getting the information from the stream. If so, what was that OS?
I only ask becuase it may seem strange to folks used to Unix-centric
languages where that information is available without opening the
file.
-Peter
--
Peter Seibel peter@javamonkey.com
Lisp is the red pill. -- John Fraser, comp.lang.lisp
- Next message: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Previous message: Andreas Yankopolus: "Re: Initializing lists/arrays with structures"
- Next in thread: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Reply: Artie Gold: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Reply: Steven M. Haflich: "Re: Why does FILE-LENGTH take a stream rather a pathname?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|