Re: The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures (was: The staggering power of closures)
From: Jacek Generowicz (jacek.generowicz_at_cern.ch)
Date: 03/03/04
- Next message: Ingvar Mattsson: "Re: Runtime optimizations"
- Previous message: John Thingstad: "Re: Should I use LISP for this?"
- In reply to: Sebastian Stern: "The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures (was: The staggering power of closures)"
- Next in thread: Joel Ray Holveck: "Re: The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures"
- Reply: Joel Ray Holveck: "Re: The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 03 Mar 2004 13:03:08 +0100
sstern42@yahoo.com (Sebastian Stern) writes:
> Jacek Generowicz:
> > Could you show me a usage of closures that would make me shout out
> > loud "But that's staggering!"?
>
> Observe and be staggered:
>
> http://www.niksula.cs.hut.fi/~candolin/scheme/beauty.html
But that's staggering!
(This relates to Unlambda in a similar way to how XML relates to
sexprs, right ? :-)
- Next message: Ingvar Mattsson: "Re: Runtime optimizations"
- Previous message: John Thingstad: "Re: Should I use LISP for this?"
- In reply to: Sebastian Stern: "The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures (was: The staggering power of closures)"
- Next in thread: Joel Ray Holveck: "Re: The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures"
- Reply: Joel Ray Holveck: "Re: The Unbearable Staggeringness of Closures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|