Re: Scheme closures
From: Arthur Lemmens (alemmens_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Petter Gustad: "Re: Socket benchmark?"
- Previous message: Arthur Lemmens: "Re: sb-thread programming tutorial?"
- In reply to: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Next in thread: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Reply: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Anton van Straaten <anton@appsolutions.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:53:00 +0200
Anton van Straaten <anton@appsolutions.com> wrote:
> there's one undeniable characteristic which both CL and Scheme
> have in common, namely standards which are, shall we say,
> particularly stable.
You mean like the time when Scheme changed from #f and nil
being the same object to #f and nil being distinct objects?
(IIRC, this was a change from R3RS to R4RS.)
-- Arthur
- Next message: Petter Gustad: "Re: Socket benchmark?"
- Previous message: Arthur Lemmens: "Re: sb-thread programming tutorial?"
- In reply to: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Next in thread: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Reply: Anton van Straaten: "Re: Scheme closures"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|