Re: Is anything easier to do in java than in lisp?
From: Antonio Menezes Leitao (Antonio.Leitao_at_evaluator.pt)
Date: 05/04/04
- Next message: Pascal Costanza: "Re: The Saddest of all Application Frameworks"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "POLL - lisp web hackers - respond before May 10th"
- In reply to: Antony Sequeira: "Re: Is anything easier to do in java than in lisp?"
- Next in thread: Christian Hofer: "Re: Is anything easier to do in java than in lisp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 21:15:53 +0100
On Tue, 04 May 2004 17:48:33 +0000, Antony Sequeira wrote:
>> Antonio Leitao.
> Hi, this is my first post to cll, never mustered enough courage to ask
> any question, so I'll start with a reply.
Welcome to comp.lang.lisp.
> Please see
> http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Intl/Supplementary/
> What I understand from the above is -
> Java chars are now just like C chars, only they are fixed to 16 bit
> width, they are not unicode chars.
Java is a moving target. The article you mentioned is from May 2004!
Anyway, the idea I got from the proposed changes is that they want to
extend the already existent (vast) support in Java for Unicode in order to
include the "Supplementary Characters" of Unicode.
Thanks for the info,
Antonio Leitao
- Next message: Pascal Costanza: "Re: The Saddest of all Application Frameworks"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "POLL - lisp web hackers - respond before May 10th"
- In reply to: Antony Sequeira: "Re: Is anything easier to do in java than in lisp?"
- Next in thread: Christian Hofer: "Re: Is anything easier to do in java than in lisp?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
