Re: Haskell: functional languages vs Lisp
Next message: Peter Seibel: "Re: Socket Programming"
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 00:55:46 +0200
On 28 May 2004 06:30:42 -0700, marcelin7@yahoo.com (Nelson Marcelino) wrote:
> Also functional programming contests held each year allow any
> language to compete. And it always seems that languages such as
> OCAML, Haskell, Dylan etc alls fare well where other languages such
> as Lisp never make it to the semifinals.
You obviously have no idea what Dylan is...
Next message: Peter Seibel: "Re: Socket Programming"
Relevant Pages
- Re: Python vs. Lisp -- please explain
... Guido *deliberately* chose to make python slow; ... epiphenomenon of certain design decisions. ... because the people who designed these languages knew a lot ... the possibility of very fast implementations (IIRC dylan specifically was ...
(comp.lang.python) - Re: Stalin (Re: Why arent you using Bigloo?)
... >>> Personally I'm more interested in getting Dylan a few more places up. ... > of any larger or more realistic venue for comparing large numbers of ... > languages on the same task. ... So the Shootout and ICFP is what we have to ...
(comp.lang.scheme) - Re: Haskell: functional languages vs Lisp
... And it always seems that languages such as ... > OCAML, Haskell, Dylan etc alls fare well where other languages such ... Not many people have entered the ICFP contest with Lisp. ...
(comp.lang.lisp) - Re: Bilingualism has ruined Canada but there is still hope.
... > Dylan> Or are you saying, to be truly bilingual, both languages ... I doubt there are real bilinguals. ... who speak two languages and can make themselves understood in both with ...
(sci.lang) - Re: In what language do you think?
... Dylan> How about 'what language do think in when you're dreaming?' ... the context makes sense. ... I cannot recall any dreams in Mandarin, ... I've also had dreams in French and Spanish -- languages that I can ...
(sci.lang) |
|
