Re: Mathematica vs. Lisp
From: Albert Reiner (areiner_at_tph.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: Paolo Amoroso: "Re: Why I'm giving up on Lisp for now"
- Previous message: Peter Herth: "Re: I wish I'd never met Lisp"
- In reply to: Richard Fateman: "Re: Mathematica vs. Lisp"
- Next in thread: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Mathematica vs. Lisp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Jun 2004 09:44:38 +0200
Richard Fateman <rfateman@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> ps. for the source of the "runic" comment, see
>
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/mma.review.pdf
Ah yes, that's it. A very interesting reading, and a lot of it is
still valid for the latest version.
Albert.
- Next message: Paolo Amoroso: "Re: Why I'm giving up on Lisp for now"
- Previous message: Peter Herth: "Re: I wish I'd never met Lisp"
- In reply to: Richard Fateman: "Re: Mathematica vs. Lisp"
- Next in thread: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Mathematica vs. Lisp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
