Use of the secondary return value of compute-effective-method
From: Yuji Minejima (ggb01164_at_nifty.ne.jp)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Greg Menke: "Re: Assembler in Common Lisp"
- Previous message: nikodemus_at_random-state.net: "Re: How do I deal with code that doesn't compile?"
- Next in thread: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Use of the secondary return value of compute-effective-method"
- Reply: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Use of the secondary return value of compute-effective-method"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:56 +0900
>From MOP's description for COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD,
http://www.lisp.org/mop/dictionary.html#compute-effective-method
> This generic function returns two values. The first is an effective
> method, the second is a list of effective method options.
For me, effective method options (actually the :arguments and the
:generic-function options given in the long form of
define-method-combination) seem to be of no or little use in this context.
Because all the processing involving these options are done inside of the
compute-effective-method body and the resulting effective method
is returned as the first value.
Could you tell me, who uses for what with this information?
Thanks, in advance.
- Next message: Greg Menke: "Re: Assembler in Common Lisp"
- Previous message: nikodemus_at_random-state.net: "Re: How do I deal with code that doesn't compile?"
- Next in thread: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Use of the secondary return value of compute-effective-method"
- Reply: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Use of the secondary return value of compute-effective-method"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|