Re: Maining of the :case keyword in make-pathname and pathname-name
From: Christophe Rhodes (csr21_at_cam.ac.uk)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: Sam Steingold: "Re: size of a bignum"
- Previous message: Edi Weitz: "Re: Lisp in hardware"
- In reply to: Peter Seibel: "Re: Maining of the :case keyword in make-pathname and pathname-name"
- Next in thread: Kevin Layer: "Re: Maining of the :case keyword in make-pathname and pathname-name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:33:24 GMT
Peter Seibel <peter@javamonkey.com> writes:
> So at least one current Common Lisp implementation (Allegro 6.2)
> considers Unix to have *no* customary case. That is the :case argument
> to pathname functions is ignored and
FWIW, I have a lot of sympathy with this view... as with many aspects
of Unix filesystem semantics, the Common Lisp pathname system really
doesn't map well in terms of case conversion (the most obvious other
example being the notion of pathname-type).
Christophe
-- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge)
- Next message: Sam Steingold: "Re: size of a bignum"
- Previous message: Edi Weitz: "Re: Lisp in hardware"
- In reply to: Peter Seibel: "Re: Maining of the :case keyword in make-pathname and pathname-name"
- Next in thread: Kevin Layer: "Re: Maining of the :case keyword in make-pathname and pathname-name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]