Re: To diff or not to diff
From: Steven E. Harris (seh_at_torus.sehlabs.com)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Previous message: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- In reply to: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Next in thread: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Reply: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:51:11 -0700
Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon@flownet.com> writes:
> It looks promising, but it too (like most version control systems
> I've looked at) is missing what I consider to be a crucial feature:
> the ability to create a private "checkpoint" of changes you've made
> to a working copy without making those changes visible to others.
BitKeeper¹ supports that concept. You can commit "deltas" to individual
files, but none of those deltas can even be seen by another repository
until you bundle them up into a "changeset".² Even then, propagating
changesets from your repository is optional.
Footnotes:
¹ http://www.bitkeeper.com/
² http://www.bitkeeper.com/UG/BitKeeper.ChangeSets.html
-- Steven E. Harris
- Next message: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Previous message: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- In reply to: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Next in thread: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Reply: Ron Garret: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|