Re: The Lisp CPU
From: Frank Buss (fb_at_frank-buss.de)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Rob Warnock: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Previous message: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Lisp Function Problem"
- In reply to: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- Next in thread: Peter Scott: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
RobertMaas@YahooGroups.Com (rem642b@Yahoo.Com) wrote:
> So don't fall into the trap of PREMATURE
> OPTIMIZATION, where you worry so much about it, and spend so much time
> tweaking your CPU to be faster here and faster there, that you never
> ship a product, never even have a working prototype to test. Wait until
> you have something working, then if it runs too slow, profile it to see
> where it's taking too much time.
My idea with real time was, that I want to be able to predict the time a
program needs to run in the worsest case. Using assicoation lists at the
hardware level for variable bindings, this would be difficult. But you are
right, perhaps this could be optimized later and first I should do the
prototype, without too much thoughts about the speed.
-- Frank Buß, fb@frank-buss.de http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
- Next message: Rob Warnock: "Re: To diff or not to diff"
- Previous message: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Lisp Function Problem"
- In reply to: rem642b_at_Yahoo.Com: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- Next in thread: Peter Scott: "Re: The Lisp CPU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
