Re: A programming language is...
From: Karl A. Krueger (kkrueger_at_example.edu)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Vassil Nikolov: "Re: Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?"
- Previous message: Vassil Nikolov: "Re: Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Stefan Ram: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Next in thread: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:08:34 +0000 (UTC)
Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> William Bland <news456@abstractnonsense.com> writes:
>>Isn't this a similar fallacy to the one people slip into when they believe
>>that representing their data using xml will magically enable any program
>>to read, write, and understand it?
>
> There are different grades of understanding. XML has more
> machine-understandable structure than plain text, but less
> than an XML-application.
Plain text has plenty of machine-understandable structure. It can be
treated as a sequence of characters, lines, tokens, or records of
fields. It is so remarkably flexible that all kinds of other structures
can be written using it -- including CSV, S-expressions, and XML. The
"understanding" in every case is in the application (or library), not in
the format itself.
An XML parser can only cope with a small fraction of files written in
the powerful language of Plain Text. :)
-- Karl A. Krueger <kkrueger@example.edu> Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Email address is spamtrapped. s/example/whoi/ "Outlook not so good." -- Magic 8-Ball Software Reviews
- Next message: Vassil Nikolov: "Re: Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?"
- Previous message: Vassil Nikolov: "Re: Initializing an array of structures in Lisp?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Stefan Ram: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Next in thread: Tayssir John Gabbour: "Re: A programming language is..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|