Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks.
From: William Bland (news456_at_abstractnonsense.com)
Date: 10/02/04
- Next message: jayessay: "Re: printing \n"
- Previous message: ole.rohne_at_cern.ch: "Re: printing \n"
- In reply to: Daniel Barlow: "Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks."
- Next in thread: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:45:27 GMT
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:59:07 +0100, Daniel Barlow wrote:
> Bottom up programming is typically practiced by people who don't fully
> understand the problem domain and are experimenting with the best
> approach.
>
> Framework creation is typically practiced by people who still don't
> fully understand the problem domain, but have an unfortunate
> combination of arrogance and lack of introspective ability, so fail to
> realise that more exploration is needed.
I find it well worth lurking on c.l.l just for the amount of sensible,
quotable material (like the above) that I find here.
Cheers,
Bill.
-- Dr. William Bland. It would not be too unfair to any language to refer to Java as a stripped down Lisp or Smalltalk with a C syntax. (Ken Anderson).
- Next message: jayessay: "Re: printing \n"
- Previous message: ole.rohne_at_cern.ch: "Re: printing \n"
- In reply to: Daniel Barlow: "Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks."
- Next in thread: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]