Re: lisp performance questions and observations
From: rif (rif_at_mit.edu)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: lisp's age"
- In reply to: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Next in thread: rif: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Reply: rif: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 25 Oct 2004 13:22:07 -0400
> I would find it educational to see what suffix trees look like in
> Lisp, so if the other posters would consider continuing to hash this
> out on the newsgroup, I'd appreciate it.
I'm travelling today. I'll post links to my implementation(s)
tomorrow. It's about 150 lines of CL, uncommented but with reasonable
naming of variables and functions.
Note that I'm not *really* using suffix-trees; I have a colleague
who's very into them, and this is more of an "Is CL good for this sort
of problem?" exercise for me. My colleague is very concerned about
memory usage, so I felt that was important, and I was exploring how
memory efficient one could reasonably make the CL version.
rif
- Next message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: lisp's age"
- In reply to: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Next in thread: rif: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Reply: rif: "Re: lisp performance questions and observations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|