Re: Static vs Dynamic
From: Peter Seibel (peter_at_javamonkey.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Joe Marshall: "Re: Potential speed"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: lisp's age"
- In reply to: William Bland: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Next in thread: Darren: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: Darren: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: M Jared Finder: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:14:56 GMT
William Bland <news456@abstractnonsense.com> writes:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:15:19 -0700, Darren wrote:
>
>> I am not talking about having to put in casts or more lines of code
>> (generally we all type at 30+ words per minute but only generate
>> 200-500 lines of code a day in any language, point being: brevity !=
>> better)
>
> This is something that really gets on my nerves. People who I work with
> often say they don't mind Java's verbosity because either they don't mind
> doing lots of typing (so go be a typist, not a programmer!), or
> because they can get their IDEs to do the typing for them.
>
> I don't care. The cost is not in the writing. The cost is in
> the reading, the understanding, and the modifying.
>
> Brevity == better!
2 a pt.
-Peter
--
Peter Seibel peter@javamonkey.com
Lisp is the red pill. -- John Fraser, comp.lang.lisp
- Next message: Joe Marshall: "Re: Potential speed"
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: lisp's age"
- In reply to: William Bland: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Next in thread: Darren: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: Darren: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: Pascal Costanza: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Reply: M Jared Finder: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|