Re: C++ sucks for games
From: Petter Gustad (newsmailcomp5_at_gustad.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Marco Baringer: "Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result"
- Previous message: Mark McConnell: "Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle"
- In reply to: Sashank Varma: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Next in thread: Computer Whizz: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Reply: Computer Whizz: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 27 Oct 2004 17:08:01 +0200
Sashank Varma <none@vanderbilt.edu> writes:
> In article <clo3rh$6um$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>,
> "Computer Whizz" <old486whizz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > What if you want to compute something like that:
> > > a + b + c + d + e + f + g + h + i + j + k + l;
> > >
> > > (with usefull names)
> > >
> > > Here Lisp only needs one +:
> > > (+ a b c d e f g h i j k l)
> > >
> >
> > Quite nice I suppose... Although I don't really mind adding those extra
> > +'s.... Then again I can't really imagine just adding alot of variables
> > together.
>
> Yeah, but this generalizes in nice ways.
Not only that, + works when the numbers are complex as well:
(+ (complex 3 3) (complex 3 -3) 3) => 9
or even rational numbers
(+ 2/3 2/3 1/3) => 5/3
Petter
-- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
- Next message: Marco Baringer: "Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result"
- Previous message: Mark McConnell: "Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle"
- In reply to: Sashank Varma: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Next in thread: Computer Whizz: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Reply: Computer Whizz: "Re: C++ sucks for games"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|