comp.lang.lisp
By Author

3195 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 09/28/04
Ending: 10/31/04

• Aaron Sloman
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/26/04)
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/24/04)
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/24/04)
  • Testers wanted: Poplog (pop11,common lisp, prolog, ML) on PC+Darwin (10/22/04)
• Adam Warner
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
  • Re: returning multiple values vs a list (10/28/04)
  • Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result (10/28/04)
  • Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result (10/27/04)
  • Perform calculations at compile time and load the result (10/27/04)
  • Linux 2.6 Memory Map (10/26/04)
  • Re: Where did all the garbage come from? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/25/04)
  • Re: Is this legal ANSI CL behaviour? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/25/04)
  • Re: Is this legal ANSI CL behaviour? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Transparent wrappers/weak types? (10/24/04)
  • Transparent wrappers/weak types? (10/23/04)
  • Re: Question (10/20/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/14/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/14/04)
  • Re: Strange LISP: [ http://www.newlisp.org ] (10/01/04)
• Alain Picard
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/06/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/01/04)
• Alan Crowe
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/30/04)
  • Re: Simple optimizatiaon problem -- signed word to integer coercion. (10/30/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/29/04)
  • Re: Special variables question (10/29/04)
  • Re: Packages and conditions (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
  • Re: Making combination lists (10/26/04)
  • Re: Where did all the garbage come from? (10/26/04)
  • Re: get-function-name (10/22/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/02/04)
  • Re: Symbolics 3620 up and running (10/01/04)
• Alan Shutko
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: lisp performance questions and observations (10/25/04)
• Albert Reiner
  • Re: Question (10/18/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/13/04)
• Alex Drummond
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: Garbage Collection for games is moot (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
• Alex Gian
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/29/04)
• Alex Mizrahi
  • web-development in ABCL (10/10/04)
  • Re: newbie: local functions (10/10/04)
  • Re: concentric loops (10/02/04)
• Alexander Burger
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/17/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/17/04)
• Alexander Schreiber
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/11/04)
• Alexey Dejneka
  • Re: Sharpsign-colon ... why here? (10/01/04)
• Andras Simon
  • Re: Embedding lisp inside html (10/30/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/09/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/09/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/09/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/05/04)
  • Re: Fun with Lisp and photos (10/03/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/03/04)
  • Re: Fun with Lisp and photos (10/03/04)
  • Re: Strange LISP: [ http://www.newlisp.org ] (10/01/04)
• Andreas Eder
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
• Andreas Krey
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
• Andrei Stebakov
  • Embedding lisp inside html (10/30/04)
• Andrei Stebkov
  • Re: Embedding lisp inside html (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows (10/24/04)
  • Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows (10/24/04)
  • Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows (10/24/04)
  • Re: Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/16/04)
  • Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/16/04)
• Andrew Thompson
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/17/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/17/04)
• André Thieme
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: Hackers like to use LISP to write dangerous programs!!! (10/26/04)
  • Re: Hackers like to use LISP to write dangerous programs!!! (10/26/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/15/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/09/04)
• Ankit K Srivastava
  • LISP resources and text editor (10/09/04)
• Anthony Pang
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Question (10/18/04)
• Antonio Menezes Leitao
  • CMUCL optimizer [was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation] (10/25/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/20/04)
  • Static vs Dynamic [was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation] (10/20/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/20/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/17/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/17/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/17/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/16/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/14/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/13/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/02/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/01/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/01/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (09/30/04)
• Ari Johnson
  • FreeBSD and Portable AllegroServe (10/10/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/09/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/09/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
  • Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/07/04)
  • Re: errors in On Lisp? (10/07/04)
  • Re: Emacs, SLIME, detachtty, mod_lisp (10/05/04)
  • Re: Emacs, SLIME, detachtty, mod_lisp (10/05/04)
  • Emacs, SLIME, detachtty, mod_lisp (10/04/04)
• Arnaud Diederen
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
• Arthur Lemmens
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/25/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/25/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/25/04)
  • Re: CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: Mailing list for Lispers in Europe (10/18/04)
  • Mailing list for Lispers in Europe (10/18/04)
  • Re: event handler and graphical output (10/09/04)
  • Re: SERIES vs. ITERATE? (10/06/04)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: Macrology: Macro for calling macro defcallback (OpenMCL) (10/30/04)
  • Re: Macrology: Macro for calling macro defcallback (OpenMCL) (10/30/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/29/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/29/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/29/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/28/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/28/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: setf with accessors (10/28/04)
  • Re: select array dimensions (10/26/04)
  • Re: Transparent wrappers/weak types? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Transparent wrappers/weak types? (10/23/04)
  • Re: set of defuns? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/19/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/19/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/19/04)
  • Re: eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Avoiding work in closures? (10/17/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/16/04)
  • Re: Different execution in package (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/13/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/04/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/02/04)
  • Re: GC implementation? (10/02/04)
  • Re: Symbolics 3620 up and running (10/02/04)
  • Re: GC implementation? (10/02/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
  • Re: eval-when :load-toplevel :execute (10/01/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
• Barry Wilkes
  • Re: LISP newbee question (10/11/04)
• Bernd Beuster
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/26/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
• Bill Clementson
  • Re: Apple ADC program and Lisp developers (10/26/04)
  • Apple ADC program and Lisp developers (10/24/04)
  • Re: set of defuns? (10/22/04)
  • Re: New Practical Common Lisp chapters on web (10/21/04)
  • Re: Denver Area Lisp User Group meeting for September (10/12/04)
• Björn Lindberg
  • Re: execute a unix command in cmucl (10/27/04)
• Bob Coyne
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
• Boris Schaefer
  • Re: Efficiency in cmucl (10/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency in cmucl (10/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency in cmucl (10/25/04)
  • Re: Efficiency in cmucl (10/25/04)
  • Efficiency in cmucl (10/25/04)
• Brad Parker
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/21/04)
• Bradley J Lucier
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
• Brian Downing
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
• Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/03/04)
• Brian Raab
  • LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/06/04)
• Bruce Nagel
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
• Bruce O'Neel
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/26/04)
• Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Challenge for lisp lovers.... (10/28/04)
• Bruno Haible
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/25/04)
  • Re: Using methods on (setf foo)? (10/21/04)
  • Re: modulus function maximum operand sizes and support for various Galois fields (10/08/04)
  • Re: adding a super class (10/05/04)
• Bulent Murtezaoglu
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: Newbie saluting the international Lisp community (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Buffering of streams? (10/15/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/11/04)
  • Re: multiple file projects (10/01/04)
• bunny
  • Re: need help with mod_lisp - apache (10/27/04)
• bunnytail
  • Re: need help with mod_lisp - apache (10/28/04)
  • need help with mod_lisp - apache (10/26/04)
• Cameron MacKinnon
  • Re: An idea worth considering?? (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: lisp performance questions and observations (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/21/04)
• Camm Maguire
  • Re: Challenge for lisp lovers.... (10/28/04)
  • Challenge for lisp lovers.... (10/28/04)
  • Re: Writing a getf style function that uses equal (10/22/04)
  • Re: Writing a getf style function that uses equal (10/20/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/20/04)
  • re: GCL - WTF? (10/06/04)
• Carl Muller
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
• Carl Shapiro
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/27/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/27/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: Symbolics 3620 up and running (10/01/04)
  • Re: [ANN] Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/01/04)
• Catalin Pitis
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
• Cesar Rabak
  • Re: Potential speed (10/25/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/25/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: Question (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/20/04)
  • Re: Question (10/20/04)
  • Re: Xemacs & clip -slime (10/19/04)
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Re: Let's have some fun for the week-end (10/18/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/14/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/14/04)
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/05/04)
  • Re: ILC 2004-is there a reason why there is no such (separate) event? (10/04/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/04/04)
• chain_lube_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/16/04)
• charlieb
  • Re: Am I pushing my luck with this? (10/24/04)
  • Re: Am I pushing my luck with this? (10/24/04)
  • Am I pushing my luck with this? (10/22/04)
• Chris Capel
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Hackers like to use LISP to write dangerous programs!!! (10/29/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/29/04)
  • Cells and object systems (10/28/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/27/04)
• Chris Dams
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/25/04)
• Chris Newcombe
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
• Christer Ericson
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
• Christian Lynbech
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
• Christophe Rhodes
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/24/04)
  • Re: Best Lisp development environment? (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/21/04)
  • Re: lisp newbie: how to debug sbcl + araneida + (slime) (10/09/04)
  • Re: Opposite of FORMAT? (10/08/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/08/04)
  • Re: cmucl dumps core after installing sbcl (10/07/04)
  • Re: cmucl dumps core after installing sbcl (10/07/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (09/30/04)
• Christophe Turle
  • Re: Efficiency in cmucl (10/25/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/24/04)
  • Re: getting fancy with packages (10/24/04)
  • trivial sockets (10/24/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: domain specific languages (10/18/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/18/04)
  • [Ann] XP pretty printer for Clisp (10/17/04)
  • Re: Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/16/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • Re: parameter-specializer (10/13/04)
  • parameter-specializer (10/12/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/12/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/08/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/08/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/08/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/08/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] the meaning of "it" (Ex: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText) (10/07/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/06/04)
  • Re: errors in On Lisp? (10/06/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/06/04)
  • Re: Sharpsign-colon ... why here? (09/30/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
• Christopher Browne
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/31/04)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/17/04)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/09/04)
  • Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/03/04)
  • Re: Query: Who cares about DFSG lisp? (10/01/04)
• Christopher C. Stacy
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Lispworks vs. pipes (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Enterprise edition (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: Embedding lisp inside html (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/30/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/29/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/28/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/28/04)
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/27/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/26/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/26/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/26/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/26/04)
  • Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/25/04)
  • Re: Is this legal ANSI CL behaviour? (10/25/04)
  • Re: Is this legal ANSI CL behaviour? (10/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/24/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/24/04)
  • Re: Lisp and GUI on Linux/Windows (10/24/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/23/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/23/04)
  • Re: Usage of resources (was: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development") (10/22/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: set of defuns? (10/22/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/22/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/22/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/22/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/19/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/08/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/04/04)
  • Re: History of the &AUX hack? Was: Re: removeText (10/04/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/03/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/01/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (09/30/04)
  • get-universal-time (09/30/04)
• Coby Beck
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/30/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/28/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/27/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: very newbie (10/13/04)
  • Re: tilt mazes (10/10/04)
  • Re: question about macro expansion (10/09/04)
  • Re: removeText (10/05/04)
  • Re: removeText (10/04/04)
• Computer Whizz
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
• cr88192
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
• Curt
  • Re: Hackers like to use LISP to write dangerous programs!!! (10/29/04)
• Damien Kick
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp (10/01/04)
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp (10/01/04)
• Dan Muller
  • Re: eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/20/04)
  • Re: eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/17/04)
  • Re: eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/17/04)
  • eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/17/04)
  • Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/04/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/04/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on defsystems (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on defsystems (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/03/04)
  • Thoughts on defsystems (10/03/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/03/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/02/04)
  • Re: Sharpsign-colon ... why here? (10/01/04)
• Dan Pierson
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
• dan_at_telent.net
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: Link Spam on Cliki (10/28/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/27/04)
  • Re: ANN: trivial-sockets 0.1 asdf-installable (10/27/04)
• Daniel Albuschat
  • Re: errors in On Lisp? (10/06/04)
• Daniel Barlow
  • Re: Enterprise edition (10/31/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/29/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/28/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/27/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/27/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/25/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/25/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/25/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/23/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/14/04)
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/14/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/12/04)
  • Re: lisp newbie: how to debug sbcl + araneida + (slime) (10/09/04)
  • Re: lisp newbie: how to debug sbcl + araneida + (slime) (10/09/04)
  • Re: lisp newbie: how to debug sbcl + araneida + (slime) (10/08/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
  • Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks. (10/02/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/02/04)
  • Re: Bottom-Up Programming vs Application Frameworks. (10/02/04)
• Daniel Lowe
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/12/04)
• Darren
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/31/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/31/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/31/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/31/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/30/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/30/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/30/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Hackers like to use LISP to write dangerous programs!!! (10/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/28/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/28/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/27/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/25/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/23/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/21/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/12/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/12/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/11/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/11/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/11/04)
  • Threads in Lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/10/04)
• Dave Roberts
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/27/04)
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/27/04)
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/26/04)
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/26/04)
  • Functions on generic sequences (10/26/04)
• David B. Ellis
  • Re: removeText (10/06/04)
• David Golden
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • [OT] C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/25/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: how to save file in lisp(cmucl) (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Best Lisp development environment? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/21/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/21/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/21/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/01/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/01/04)
• David Kastrup
  • Re: Xemacs & clip -slime (10/19/04)
• David Sletten
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: Prototype based programming in Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/26/04)
  • Re: Making combination lists (10/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: how to save file in lisp(cmucl) (10/21/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: Question (10/19/04)
  • Re: Question (10/18/04)
  • Re: Question (10/18/04)
  • Re: Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/17/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: newbie: local functions (10/10/04)
  • Re: newbie: local functions (10/09/04)
• David Steuber
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/29/04)
  • Re: Do academics really love Lisp? I doubt! (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/29/04)
  • Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT (10/27/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/27/04)
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/26/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie saluting the international Lisp community (10/26/04)
  • Re: Static vs Dynamic (10/26/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: how to save file in lisp(cmucl) (10/24/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/21/04)
  • Writing a getf style function that uses equal (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/18/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/14/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/14/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/13/04)
  • Re: Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/13/04)
  • Are Anonymous Functions Garbage Collected? (10/13/04)
  • Re: Statistics for comp.lang.lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: Starting Over Again (10/09/04)
  • Re: errors in On Lisp? (10/08/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/08/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/08/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/08/04)
  • Starting Over Again (10/08/04)
• David Wallis
  • execute a unix command in cmucl (10/27/04)
  • Where did all the garbage come from? (10/25/04)
  • Array Operators (Was help executing a list) (10/25/04)
  • Re: help executing a list (10/20/04)
  • Re: help executing a list (10/19/04)
  • help executing a list (10/15/04)
• Deepankar Sharma
  • An idea worth considering?? (10/31/04)
• Dirk Gerrits
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/25/04)
  • Re: CMUCL optimizer (10/25/04)
  • Let's prove them wrong [Was: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development"] (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: universal SETF (10/20/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/19/04)
  • Re: Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/17/04)
  • [ANN] Erlisp website (10/13/04)
• Dirk Thierbach
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/28/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/27/04)
• Dominique Boucher
  • Minutes of meeting - Montreal Scheme/Lisp User Group (10/26/04)
  • [Ann] Montreal Scheme/Lisp User Group meeting (10/17/04)
• Don Geddis
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
• Douglas Philips
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/19/04)
  • Re: eval-when -- pls check my understanding (10/18/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/08/04)
• drcode_at_gmail.com
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/29/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: ILC 2003 Paul Graham ARC notes... (10/08/04)
  • ILC 2003 Paul Graham ARC notes... (10/07/04)
• Drew Krause
  • Re: getting fancy with packages (10/26/04)
  • getting fancy with packages (10/24/04)
• drewc
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Vancouver Lisp Users. (10/19/04)
  • Lisp Template Languages (was :Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp) (10/12/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
  • Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp (10/08/04)
• Duane Rettig
  • Re: Again. Resource deallocation in Common Lisp. (10/28/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/27/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: nonhomogenous structs (was: lisp performance questions and observations) (10/26/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/26/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/25/04)
  • Re: nonhomogenous structs (was: lisp performance questions and observations) (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp performance questions and observations (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp performance questions and observations (10/25/04)
  • Re: lisp performance questions and observations (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: Which form do you prefer (and why)? (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Buffering of streams? (10/15/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/15/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/14/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/14/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/05/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/04/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/03/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/03/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/02/04)
  • Re: GC implementation? (10/02/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/02/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/02/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/01/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/01/04)
  • Re: eval-when :load-toplevel :execute (10/01/04)
  • Re: Question about compilation/evaluation environments (10/01/04)
  • Re: Sharpsign-colon ... why here? (09/30/04)
• E T Einarsson
  • Re: mouse drawing (10/25/04)
  • mouse drawing (10/12/04)
• Ed Symanzik
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/07/04)
• Edi Weitz
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: Perform calculations at compile time and load the result (10/29/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/28/04)
  • Re: clisp - eval function problem (10/28/04)
  • Re: execute a unix command in cmucl (10/27/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/27/04)
  • Re: need help with mod_lisp - apache (10/26/04)
  • Re: reject duplicates in a hashtable? (10/26/04)
  • Re: Lisp on Solaris 8 and Windows 2000 (10/26/04)
  • Re: ALU CLiki invaded by spam (10/25/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/24/04)
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/24/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Best Lisp development environment? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Best Lisp development environment? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Best Lisp development environment? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Lisp books with a slightly different angle (10/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie question: how to save file in lisp(cmucl) (10/21/04)
  • Re: pregexp vs. read (10/21/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: Programming Paradigms in Lisp (10/20/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: flushing/draining stdout (10/20/04)
  • Re: How to detect fill pointer? (10/19/04)
  • Re: enclose, was Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/18/04)
  • Re: Slime and typeout frame (10/17/04)
  • Re: Serializing data structures (10/14/04)
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/14/04)
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/12/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/09/04)
  • Re: mod_lisp and Lisplets (10/09/04)
  • Re: superclasses of and subclasses of (10/08/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/08/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/05/04)
  • Re: Simple problem in PG's ANSI Common Lisp (10/05/04)
  • Re: Compiling methods on the fly (10/03/04)
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp (10/02/04)
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp (10/02/04)
  • Re: Small Corman Lisp source samples? (10/01/04)
  • Re: get-universal-time (10/01/04)
• Eduardo Muñoz
  • Re: Emacs, SLIME, detachtty, mod_lisp (10/05/04)
• Edward Tate
  • Lisp questions (10/27/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/16/04)
  • Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/14/04)
• Emre Sevinc
  • Re: Newbie saluting the international Lisp community (10/30/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Do academics really love Lisp? I doubt! (10/28/04)
  • Re: Newbie saluting the international Lisp community (10/23/04)
  • Newbie saluting the international Lisp community (10/22/04)
• Eric Schmidt
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/18/04)
• Eric Smith
  • Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/26/04)
• Espen Vestre
  • Re: Running Standalone Lisp Programs (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • Re: Functions on generic sequences (10/26/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/26/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/22/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/20/04)
  • Re: Programming Paradigms in Lisp (10/20/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/06/04)
• FormerPerlHacker
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/29/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/28/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/26/04)
  • Re: trivial sockets (10/26/04)
• Frank Buss
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: Lisp GUI Tutorials (10/30/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Lottery number generation (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: why C++ STILL sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/27/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/26/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/25/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/25/04)
  • Re: mouse drawing (10/25/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: List of all files in directory (10/24/04)
  • Re: mouse drawing (10/24/04)
  • Games in CLIM (10/24/04)
  • Re: CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • Re: CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • Re: CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • Re: CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • CLIM Gadgets (10/23/04)
  • Re: Usage of resources (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/22/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/21/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/20/04)
  • Re: universal SETF (10/20/04)
  • Re: universal SETF (10/20/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.lisp archives (10/19/04)
  • Re: get-function-name (10/19/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/17/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/17/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/16/04)
  • Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/15/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/14/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/14/04)
  • Re: very newbie (10/12/04)
  • Re: very newbie (10/12/04)
  • Re: LISP newbee question (10/12/04)
  • Re: Threads in Lisp (10/10/04)
  • Re: tilt mazes (10/10/04)
  • Re: tilt mazes (10/09/04)
  • Re: newbie: local functions (10/09/04)
  • tilt mazes (10/09/04)
  • avoiding redundancy in Generalized Reference (10/08/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/08/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/08/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/08/04)
  • Re: LISP is dead now ! ! ! (10/08/04)
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/07/04)
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/05/04)
  • Re: modulus function (10/05/04)
  • Re: median of 3 values. (10/05/04)
  • Re: Fun with Lisp and photos (10/03/04)
• Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
  • Re: Macrology: Macro for calling macro defcallback (OpenMCL) (10/30/04)
  • Macrology: Macro for calling macro defcallback (OpenMCL) (10/30/04)
• Fred Bayer
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
• Fred Gilham
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/27/04)
  • Re: lisp's age (10/26/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/26/04)
  • Re: Another way to get a Lisp Machine (10/21/04)
  • Re: Passing function as a parameter in CMUCL (10/17/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: LISP PROGRAMMING (10/16/04)
  • Re: very newbie (10/12/04)
  • Re: question about macro expansion (10/08/04)
• Fredo
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
• FreewareTown.com
  • Free Software (10/09/04)
• Friedrich Dominicus
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/14/04)
• Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
  • Re: Special variables question (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/25/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/23/04)
  • Re: Poplog common lisp meets the gcl random tester (10/22/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/14/04)
  • Re: Getting started in Lisp: simple tasks (10/14/04)
  • Re: User-defined EQUALP (10/13/04)
  • Re: Is a given list an executable form (10/11/04)
  • Re: concentric loops (10/01/04)
  • Re: concentric loops (10/01/04)
  • Re: GC implementation? (10/01/04)
  • Re: GC implementation? (10/01/04)
• Förster_vom_Silberwald
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/19/04)
• Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/31/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/30/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: clisp on the rise? (10/28/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/28/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/28/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: OT Reptitive Strain Injury (10/27/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: Employment puzzles and Lisp (10/27/04)
  • Re: Challenge: Triangles puzzle (10/27/04)
  • Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development" (10/24/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/22/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/22/04)
  • Re: Recommended Sources? (10/22/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
  • Re: CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/21/04)
  • CMU CL or SBCL on (FreeBSD/)AMD64 any time soon? (10/20/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/20/04)
  • Re: Sacla loop: a new loop implementation (10/19/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/17/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/15/04)
  • Re: changing a symbol name (10/15/04)
  • Re: Lisp benefits against other functional programming languages (10/15/04)
  • Re: tilt mazes (10/12/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/09/04)
  • Re: READ-CHAR-NO-HANG and the read-evaluate-print-loop (10/09/04)
  • Re: converting a number to a list!!!! (10/09/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/04/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/03/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/03/04)
  • Re: printing \n (10/02/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/02/04)
  • Re: how to pronounce these names (10/02/04)
  • Re: Strange LISP: [ http://www.newlisp.org ] (10/01/04)
• George Neuner
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/30/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/29/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/28/04)
  • Re: Potential speed (10/27/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/21/04)
  • Re: Python & C++ and Lisp questions (10/20/04)
• Gerry Quinn
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)
  • Re: C++ sucks for games (10/31/04)