Re: Static vs Dynamic
From: Darren (pyedarren_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/04/04
- Next message: Mark McConnell: "Re: Practical Lisp: What are you working on, really?"
- Previous message: Wade Humeniuk: "Re: Practical Lisp: What are you working on, really?"
- In reply to: Rahul Jain: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Next in thread: William Bland: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 4 Nov 2004 09:26:07 -0800
Rahul Jain <rjain@nyct.net> wrote in message news:<87sm7q70ox.fsf@nyct.net>...
> pyedarren@hotmail.com (Darren) writes:
>
> > Whatever. Factory loading, incase you are unfamiliar, is typically
> > done using a hash table, the Factory Pattern and class loading. The
> > Factory loads the class on demand or extracts it from a cache and
> > returns... Never mind, if you thought I was implementing a "dirty
> > hack", you wouldn't get it. It's obvious to me you don't do real
> > programming and probably couldn't see the value of such a thing in a
> > real system.
>
> It's obvious that you know nothing about Lisp, since you are pretending
> that the "Factory pattern" is actually something novel to us.
"Factory Loading" != "Factory Pattern"
"Facotry Loading" composed of "Factory Pattern"
I wasn't explaining what the factory pattern is, I was explaining what
factory loading in Java is. You should read before commenting.
- Next message: Mark McConnell: "Re: Practical Lisp: What are you working on, really?"
- Previous message: Wade Humeniuk: "Re: Practical Lisp: What are you working on, really?"
- In reply to: Rahul Jain: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Next in thread: William Bland: "Re: Static vs Dynamic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]