Re: UNIX os stuff in lisp
From: Edi Weitz (spamtrap_at_agharta.de)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Thomas A. Russ: "Re: C++ sucks for games.... oh really?"
- Previous message: Lynn Winebarger: "Re: Unified lisp"
- In reply to: Jim Newton: "Re: UNIX os stuff in lisp"
- Next in thread: Björn Lindberg: "Re: UNIX os stuff in lisp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:34:16 +0100
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:18:31 +0100, Jim Newton <jimka@rdrop.com> wrote:
> I'm taking a look at
> <http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/doc/cmu-user/extensions.html#toc46>
> and i have some questions about the :status-hook. It is a function
> that gets called automatically when my child process's status
> changes. What happens if i have 100 child processes and many of
> their statuses change at about the same time? Do i need to worry
> about this? What if the status changes before i get finished
> creating all my processes? What if the status-hook function is
> running, and before it finishes another processes status changes?
> Do i need to implement a locking mechanism myself to handle this
> situation?
That's most likely a question for the CMUCL mailing list.
-- Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@agharta.de" 5) "edi")
- Next message: Thomas A. Russ: "Re: C++ sucks for games.... oh really?"
- Previous message: Lynn Winebarger: "Re: Unified lisp"
- In reply to: Jim Newton: "Re: UNIX os stuff in lisp"
- Next in thread: Björn Lindberg: "Re: UNIX os stuff in lisp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]