Re: Details on delivering and managing application
From: Trent Buck (geragohpx_at_tznvy.pbz)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Why choose Franz ACL over LispWorks?"
- Previous message: Trent Buck: "Re: Why choose Franz ACL over LispWorks?"
- In reply to: Wade Humeniuk: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Next in thread: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Reply: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 03:56:15 GMT
Up spake Wade Humeniuk:
> I am also pretty sure that in some OS models there are things called
> light-weight processes that are used to implement processes and
> threads.
ISTR that in _Modern Operating Systems_ Andy Tanenbaum asserts that
"lightweight process" and "thread" are synonymous. I got the impression
that different research groups coined different terms. Unfortunately
I'm at work and my bookshelf is at home.
-- -trent "Shut up," she explained.
- Next message: Kenny Tilton: "Re: Why choose Franz ACL over LispWorks?"
- Previous message: Trent Buck: "Re: Why choose Franz ACL over LispWorks?"
- In reply to: Wade Humeniuk: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Next in thread: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Reply: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Details on delivering and managing application"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]