Re: demonic numbers !
From: Fred Gilham (gilham_at_snapdragon.csl.sri.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: freshjada_at_hotmail.com: "Freelance"
- Previous message: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- In reply to: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- Next in thread: Michael Kappert: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 09 Feb 2005 14:53:46 -0800
Cameron MacKinnon <cmackin+nn@clearspot.net> writes:
> It's an expectations thing. No neophyte would be surprised if they gave
> a machine a batch of numbers (which were, in the person's mind,
> approximate) and the machine took the numbers as exact and produced an
> exact answer. A good portion of the population ARE surprised when they
> give machines numbers to add and the machines take license with the
> numbers and produce approximate answers.
I only have one comment about this: "heavy boots."
--
Fred Gilham gilham@csl.sri.com
If there is one consistent theme to be found in the great works of the
20th century, it seems to me to be the presentation of a doomed quest:
the search to find something capable of filling that great void that
has been left in the soul of man by the repudiation of God.
--- Skylar Hamilton Burris
- Next message: freshjada_at_hotmail.com: "Freelance"
- Previous message: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- In reply to: Cameron MacKinnon: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- Next in thread: Michael Kappert: "Re: demonic numbers !"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|