Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment
From: Pascal Bourguignon (spam_at_mouse-potato.com)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: Andreas Thiele: "Re: string to symbol"
- Previous message: John Thingstad: "Re: What's the deal with GUILE, GCL, and Emacs-lisp?"
- In reply to: Ulrich Hobelmann: "[OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Next in thread: Stefan Scholl: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Mar 2005 11:40:46 +0100
Ulrich Hobelmann <u.hobelmann@web.de> writes:
> [...]
> I plan for PostLisp to be more array than list-oriented (except for
> parsing and macros etc.), as the map function suggests, so maybe it
> should be called POAP (POstfix Array Processing).
> [...]
You should try LOGO.
-- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ Wanna go outside. Oh, no! Help! I got outside! Let me back inside!
- Next message: Andreas Thiele: "Re: string to symbol"
- Previous message: John Thingstad: "Re: What's the deal with GUILE, GCL, and Emacs-lisp?"
- In reply to: Ulrich Hobelmann: "[OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Next in thread: Stefan Scholl: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|