Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment
From: Stefan Scholl (stesch_at_no-spoon.de)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: Joerg Hoehle: "Re: Macros, declare, and locally"
- Previous message: charlieb: "Lisp based spring/mass GA to play with."
- In reply to: Ulrich Hobelmann: "[OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Next in thread: Svein Ove Aas: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Svein Ove Aas: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Ulrich Hobelmann: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Kenny Tilton: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:34:22 +0100
On 2005-03-10 08:05:47, Ulrich Hobelmann wrote:
> (Sorry for crossposting this. If you specifically refer to one language
> family only, please post the answer only to one group.)
>
> There are several things I (and others) don't really like about Lisp and
> Forth, but most live with it. Today I set out to try a mix of both to
> see, how certain things improve.
>
> IMHO the worst thing in Lisp is its many parentheses.
OK. I don't have to read any further.
- Next message: Joerg Hoehle: "Re: Macros, declare, and locally"
- Previous message: charlieb: "Lisp based spring/mass GA to play with."
- In reply to: Ulrich Hobelmann: "[OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Next in thread: Svein Ove Aas: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Svein Ove Aas: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Ulrich Hobelmann: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Reply: Kenny Tilton: "Re: [OT] PostLisp, a language experiment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]