Re: The library metric
From: Paolo Amoroso (amoroso_at_mclink.it)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: Lisp fragmentation (was Re: Python becoming less Lisp-like)"
- Previous message: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- In reply to: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Next in thread: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Reply: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Reply: David Golden: "Re: The library metric"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:41:06 +0100
"Brandon J. Van Every" <try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname@yahoo.com> writes:
> When Microsoft steamrollers everyone else in the industry, it's not doing it
> with technology. 2/3 of the gameplan is marketing. The lessons of Redmond
Okay, here's a deal: you give us 10% of Microsoft's marketing budget,
and we produce nice commercials, slick logos, brochures, coffee mugs,
cool t-shirts, shiny ads on glossy paper magazines, all sorts of
gadgets, you name it.
In the meantime, here is my marketing: Lisp is back.
Paolo
-- Why Lisp? http://lisp.tech.coop/RtL%20Highlight%20Film Recommended Common Lisp libraries/tools (see also http://clrfi.alu.org): - ASDF/ASDF-INSTALL: system building/installation - CL-PPCRE: regular expressions - UFFI: Foreign Function Interface
- Next message: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: Lisp fragmentation (was Re: Python becoming less Lisp-like)"
- Previous message: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- In reply to: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Next in thread: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Reply: Brandon J. Van Every: "Re: The library metric"
- Reply: David Golden: "Re: The library metric"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|