Lisp standard for multiprocessing
From: Christopher C. Stacy (cstacy_at_news.dtpq.com)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Random questions from a slightly less newbie lisper.."
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Random questions from a slightly less newbie lisper.."
- Next in thread: Christophe Rhodes: "Re: Lisp standard for multiprocessing"
- Reply: Christophe Rhodes: "Re: Lisp standard for multiprocessing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:38:08 GMT
If people want to standardize something, how about multi-processing?
That ought include both threads (of whatever types are available in a
given implementation), synchronization, as well as thread-safety
definitions for primitive language elements. This would also be
an opportunity to add futures to the language.
There's a bunch of hair that should keep you busy...
- Next message: Pascal Bourguignon: "Re: Random questions from a slightly less newbie lisper.."
- Previous message: Christopher C. Stacy: "Re: Random questions from a slightly less newbie lisper.."
- Next in thread: Christophe Rhodes: "Re: Lisp standard for multiprocessing"
- Reply: Christophe Rhodes: "Re: Lisp standard for multiprocessing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]