Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- From: Dave Watson <djwatson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:27:37 +0000 (UTC)
> That's only because current coding languages are based on the wrong
> fundamental principles. Get rid of CALL / RETURN (and RPC's and other
> variants) and a whole lot of hidden, breakable dependencies disappear.
>
I have often wondered if there were not another abstraction that got
rid of call/return similarly to how functional languages rid the need
of 'set'. Do you happen to have any liturature on such languages?
Formal papers perhaps?
--
-Dave Watson
djwatson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- From: Paul Tarvydas
- Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- References:
- The Amazon PCL tide may be heading back out to sea
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: The Amazon PCL tide may be heading back out to sea
- From: jonathon
- Re: The Amazon PCL tide may be heading back out to sea
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: The Amazon PCL tide may be heading back out to sea
- From: Takuon Soho
- OT: geometrical algorithm design
- From: Adrian Kubala
- Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- From: Paul Tarvydas
- The Amazon PCL tide may be heading back out to sea
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there a way to conditionally load lisp files?
- Next by Date: Re: Is there a way to conditionally load lisp files?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- Next by thread: Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|