Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann <u.hobelmann@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:32:15 -0500
Steven E. Harris wrote:
The Usenet Big 8 most certainly is. The mechanism may be distributed, but the view is highly centralized.
The DNS top-level domains are centralized too. So what?
True. But even beyond Gmane, it's possible for specific news servers to host small sets of groups, even if other servers don't propagate those groups. I concede that the overhead in getting one's writing onto a news server is much higher than sticking Web pages and attendant RSS files on a Web server, or pouring one's heart into some Roach Motel system like Blogger or LiveJournal.
Overhead? Well, opening Thunderbird and just clicking reply or new-message is certainly easier than directing my browser to a specific bookmark, logging in (if I'm not already), clicking reply, and submitting text. Every of these "context switches" causes another HTML page to load, which might take time, too. I certainly prefer *real* applications that prefer some kind of protocol to web interfaces, especially if those web interfaces make a horizontal scrollbar appear in my browser window (like those stupid, ugly, vastly popular 3-column-layouts).
By all means, show us these web browsers that package up exactly the same functionality of scouring the web for content of interest.
I was referring to features in older versions of Internet Explorer (and perhaps Netscape) around 1997 that allowed one to designate certain bookmarks as "live" or something. The browser would keep track of the last update time for the resources pointed to by these bookmarks. Based on some periodicity or upon explicit command, the browser would poll for each bookmark to see if the respective resource had been updated. If so, the browser would highlight the bookmark and perhaps download the resource, caching it for later viewing.
And its sequel Mozilla. Open a bookmark's properties dialog. I have never used anything there, but I remember seeing all kinds of options there...
--
No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent. -- Abraham Lincoln
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- From: Steven E. Harris
- Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- References:
- Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- From: David Steuber
- Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- From: Christopher C. Stacy
- Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- RSS vs. NNTP (was: Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?)
- From: Brandon J. Van Every
- Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- From: Steven E. Harris
- Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- From: Brandon J. Van Every
- Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- From: Steven E. Harris
- Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- Prev by Date: Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- Next by Date: Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
- Previous by thread: Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- Next by thread: Re: RSS vs. NNTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|