Re: newbie: m-expressions
- From: M Jared Finder <jared@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:13:17 -0700
falcon wrote:
Although I don't appreciate the syntax completely, I'm starting to see the elegance. I think I'm well on my way to being convinced of Lisp's greatness, but the application for which I started looking at LISP will require average technical people to interact with it. Think of a database with stored procedure language. I can build my database management system in a language of my own choice (let's say lisp) but when I provide a language for the end-user, it needs to be like C/C++/Java/etc. (just an example).
Now I can parse my language and translate it to Lisp...but if there is a well thought-out standard way of doing it (I hoped M-Expressions were it) then it makes it easier for me.
Just make your programming language XML-based. Then you get the power of S-expressions with the marketability of XML. The same people who hate reading (or (> x y) (func?)) will be fine with the XML equivalent:
<or> <greater-than>x y</greater-than> <func /> </or>
-- MJF .
- References:
- newbie: m-expressions
- From: falcon
- Re: newbie: m-expressions
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: newbie: m-expressions
- From: falcon
- newbie: m-expressions
- Prev by Date: Re: should load translate-logical-pathname
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp Optimised Workstation
- Previous by thread: Re: newbie: m-expressions
- Next by thread: Re: newbie: m-expressions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|