Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Frank Buss <fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/28/1936206
Peter Wright <pete@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought the review was pretty decent.
thanks. English is not my native language, but Tim, the Slashdot editor,
corrected some of my grammatical errors before publishing it :-)
--
Frank Buß, fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- References:
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Wright
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Re: ANSI question (load evaluation order)
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|