Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:43:30 +0200
Peter Seibel <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Probably good advice. On the other hand, it turns out /. still has
> some clout--PCL's Amazon Sales Rank, which was at 2,771 just before
> the review appeared, is back in the three-digit range, and within 40
> or so of it's best ever, presumably thanks to appearing on /. (and
> subsequent diffusion of chatter via del.icio.us and bloggers who saw
> it on /.) Interesting.
Well, I meant to not bother with their opinions--it's better to
concentrate on their pockets :)
Paolo
--
Why Lisp? http://lisp.tech.coop/RtL%20Highlight%20Film
Recommended Common Lisp libraries/tools (see also http://clrfi.alu.org):
- ASDF/ASDF-INSTALL: system building/installation
- CL-PPCRE: regular expressions
- UFFI: Foreign Function Interface
.
- References:
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- Next by Date: Re: timer in cmucl?
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
