Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc <drewc@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:55:24 GMT
Frank Buss wrote:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/28/1936206
thanks. English is not my native language, but Tim, the Slashdot editor, corrected some of my grammatical errors before publishing it :-)
I really enjoyed the review and comments afterwards, but next time you plan on getting me slashdotted, could you send me an email first so i can watch it happen :)
72000 + hits from that slashdot article on a cliki using a serve-event listener on a UML instance with 128mb RAM, and it stayed solid... Lisp is "practical" indeed :)
Anyways, great review Frank, great book Peter, great software Dan B., great language John M. et al. :)
-- Drew Crampsie drewc at tech dot coop "Never mind the bollocks -- here's the sexp's tools." -- Karl A. Krueger on comp.lang.lisp .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- References:
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Wright
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Frank Buss
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
- Next by Date: Re: What next after 'Practical' ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Index(es):