Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Steven Huwig <Steven.Huwig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:33:20 GMT
In article <1114785217.025956.265870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Joseph Wecker" <ggroups.jwecker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "I'm trying to get people to think
> about the mismatch between Common Lisp and Unix and why there may be
> valid
> technical reasons for avoiding Common Lisp as a glue language upon
> Unix."
>
>
> For those who haven't taken a good look or would like to know more,
> http://www.scsh.net/ deals with these issues in depth. I've been
> seriously contemplating working on something similar for CL, so this
> dialogue is very welcome.
>
> -Joseph
Having only recently discovered scsh and then immediately wishing for a
CL variant, I'd really like to hear more about such a project. When I
start using scsh for real-world tasks where I'd normally use Perl or
ksh, I'll certainly volunteer critiques and ideas. I should have plenty
to say in a couple weeks. :)
If you do get an effort underway, I'd be glad to help, if only mostly as
a tester.
-- Steve
.
- References:
- Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Adam Warner
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Adam Warner
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Kirk Job Sluder
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Joseph Wecker
- Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp Thesaurus
- Next by Date: Re: Purely applicative programming?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
