Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- From: dingolord@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Apr 2005 20:21:32 -0700
I believe that one reason is how incredibly accessible python is to
both people who have c/c++/java experience and people who are
completely new to programming. The documentation on python.org is
superb; the tutorial is enough to get anyone writing a useful
application (which is easily distributable and cross-platform) after a
few hours of study; and the documentation for the extensive (which is
another plus) standard library leaves nothing to be desired. Another
great plus is the availability of good gui toolkit bindings; if I'm
writing something for which a gui is necessary I immediately reach for
pygtk.
I personally prefer programming in cl, I find it more enjoyable, but I
don't program for the sake of programming; I do it to solve problems;
often with python it is simpler to write a small to medium sized
cross-platform gui and network application and distribute it than with
cl.
-d
.
- References:
- Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- From: Nikhil Ketkar
- Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- From: Wade Humeniuk
- Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- From: Nikhil Ketkar
- Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- From: Wade Humeniuk
- Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
- Next by Date: Re: A cool thing Lisp can do...
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|