Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:41:51 +0200
drewc <drewc@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> I really enjoyed the review and comments afterwards, but next time you
> plan on getting me slashdotted, could you send me an email first so i
> can watch it happen :)
>
> 72000 + hits from that slashdot article on a cliki using a serve-event
> listener on a UML instance with 128mb RAM, and it stayed solid... Lisp
> is "practical" indeed :)
You may post this comment to Slashdot's PCL thread.
Paolo
--
Why Lisp? http://lisp.tech.coop/RtL%20Highlight%20Film
Recommended Common Lisp libraries/tools (see also http://clrfi.alu.org):
- ASDF/ASDF-INSTALL: system building/installation
- CL-PPCRE: regular expressions
- UFFI: Foreign Function Interface
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- References:
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Wright
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Frank Buss
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Next by Date: Re: What next after 'Practical' ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|